Kingvision Pay-Per-View Ltd. v. Autar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that statutory damages of $50 per patron is generally appropriate, and that “although the amount of damages should be an adequate deterrent, [a single] violation is not so serious as to warrant putting the restaurant out of business”
• noting Senate Committee’s intent that full costs include “reasonable investigative fees (related to the action brought) of an aggrieved party.”
• noting Senate Committee’s intent that full costs include “reasonable investigative fees (related to the action brought) of an aggrieved party.”
• suggesting after analysis that “full costs” in 47 U.S.C. § 605 includes investigative costs
• awarding investigative fees in trademark infringement action
• “While the term, ‘full 19 costs,’ is not defined in the statute, . . . the plain meaning of the statutory language . . . 20 suggest[s] that this term was intended to include expenses other than ‘taxable costs’ . . . . 21 [T]he ‘full costs’ permitted under § 605(e)(3)(B)(iii

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).