· 4/27/2004
Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Corp., Ltd. v. 898 Belmont, Inc., D/B/A El Toro Bar Berhanu Degife
Citations
- 366 F.3d 217
- 32 Communications Reg. (P&F) 398
- 70 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1786
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8240
- 2004 WL 885242
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Determining the statute of limitations period for activity governed by a federal statute [or the Constitution] is a question of federal law.”
- “Determining the statute of limitations period for activity governed by a federal statute [or the Constitution] is a question of federal law.”
- “Determining the statute of limitations period for activity governed by a federal statute [or the Constitution] is a question of federal law.”
- “Determining the statute of limitations period for activity governed by a federal statute [or the Constitution] is a question of federal law.”
- “Determining the statute of limitations period for activity governed by a federal statute [or the Constitution] is a question of federal law.”
- distinguishing Prostar on that ground
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roth, Barry, Fuentes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.