· 7/18/1990
Kingsley v. Woodbury County Civil Service Commission
Citations
- 459 N.W.2d 265
- 1990 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 179
- 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,232
- 57 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1629
- 1990 WL 102376
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the exclusive remedy for complainants asserting a discriminatory act-lies with the procedure provided in [the ICRA]”
- noting that “the exclusive remedy for complainants asserting a discriminatory act lies with the procedure provided in [the ICRA]”
- noting that “the exclusive remedy for complainants asserting a discriminatory act lies with the procedure provided in [the ICRA]”
- noting that “the exclusive remedy for complainants asserting a discriminatory act lies with the procedure provided in [the ICRA]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larson, Carter, Lavorato, Neuman, Andreasen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.