Kingsbery v. Kingsbery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court found the husband had explicitly traced his separate funds through his testimony and documentary evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In Re Marriage of Flower
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-02-25· cited 68×
• Nace v. Nace
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-12-13· cited 47×
• Hatch v. Hatch
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-03-19· cited 47×
• Drahos v. Rens
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-12-13· cited 45×
• Porter v. Porter
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-07-14· cited 42×
• In the Matter of J. C. Catlow, Debtor. Lawrence J. Marks, Individually and on Behalf of Wendy Kay Hall v. J. C. Catlow
  Ninth Circuit· 1981-12-14· cited 41×
• Potthoff v. Potthoff
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-01-29· cited 36×
• Myers-Leiber Sign Co. v. Weirich
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-01-27· cited 27×
• Hurst v. Hurst
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-04-28· cited 25×
• Cargill v. Hancock
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1968-08-07· cited 24×
• Hanrahan v. Sims
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-07-19· cited 21×
• Barnett v. Barnett
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-01-22· cited 19×
• Stock v. Stock
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-12-29· cited 18×
• Bourne v. Lord
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-02-22· cited 17×
• Sampson v. Transport Indemnity Company
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-09-08· cited 13×
• Chadwick v. Winn
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-12-22· cited 13×
• In Re Estate of Sims
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-10-15· cited 9×
• Rodieck v. Rodieck
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-02-13· cited 9×
• Schock v. Schock
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-12-02· cited 5×
• Olsztyn v. Olsztyn
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-10-02· cited 5×