Skip to main content
· 5/29/2007

King, William v. Jackson, Alphonso

Citations

  • 487 F.3d 970
  • 376 U.S. App. D.C. 284
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12341
  • 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,850
  • 100 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1267
  • 2007 WL 1529479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying de novo standard to district court dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6)
  • applying de novo standard to district court dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6)
  • same where the plaintiff did “not allege that his opposition was directed at any act of employment discrimination allegedly taken by the defendant”
  • reviewing de novo a grant of a motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.