· 5/29/2007
King, William v. Jackson, Alphonso
Citations
- 487 F.3d 970
- 376 U.S. App. D.C. 284
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12341
- 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,850
- 100 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1267
- 2007 WL 1529479
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying de novo standard to district court dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6)
- applying de novo standard to district court dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6)
- same where the plaintiff did “not allege that his opposition was directed at any act of employment discrimination allegedly taken by the defendant”
- reviewing de novo a grant of a motion to dismiss
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.