King v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that the plenary court “grant leave to amend one time, conditioned on the plaintiff paying the defendants’ attorneys’ fees”
• stating that Delaware courts strongly encourage shareholder-plaintiffs to utilize inspection rights before filing a derivative suit to meet demand futility pleading requirements under Delaware rules
• acknowledging that dismissal of a later-filed Section 220 action was proper when the “stockholder-plaintiff’s plenary derivative complaint was still pending and the plenary court had not granted the plaintiff leave to amend”
• acknowledging that dismissal of a later-filed Section 220 action was proper when the “stockholder-plaintiff’s plenary derivative complaint was still pending and the plenary court had not granted the plaintiff leave to amend”
• permitting inspection where court in plenary action had granted plaintiff leave to amend
• deciding appeal where underlying case moot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).