Skip to main content
· 10/3/2011

King v. Triser Salons, L.L.C.

Citations

  • 815 F. Supp. 2d 328
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113410
  • 2011 WL 4543035

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that where plaintiffs’ “opposition to the motion to dismiss proffers additional facts” a court “may only consider the facts set forth in the complaint when evaluating a motion to dismiss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Amy Berman Jackson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.