Skip to main content
· 11/29/1977

King v. THOMPSON & McKINNON, AUCHINCLOSS, ETC.

Citations

  • 352 So. 2d 1235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that filing an answer, which does not make a demand for arbitration, constitutes a waiver of the right to arbitrate
  • arbitration waived by filing answer and cross-claim, arbitration issue not raised until interrogatories were served
  • defendant abandoned arbitration right when it answered a cross-claim and filed a reciprocal cross-claim prior to moving for arbitration
  • defendant abandoned right to arbitration by answering complaint without demanding arbitration
  • filing answer without asserting right for arbitration acts as waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Letts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.