Skip to main content
· 10/26/1972

King v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR COUNTY OF MARICOPA

Citations

  • 502 P.2d 529
  • 108 Ariz. 492
  • 60 A.L.R. 3d 172
  • 1972 Ariz. LEXIS 376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agreeing “a mistrial places the parties in the same position as if the case had never been tried”
  • \[I]t is always possible that the trial judge may subconsciously resent the lawyer or defendant who got the judgment reversed. The mere possibility of such a thought in the back of a trial judge's mind means that a new judge should be found.\
  • On remand for new trial, “it is always possible that the trial judge may subconsciously resent the lawyer or defendant who got the judgment reversed. The mere possibility of such a thought in the back of a trial judge’s mind means that a new judge should be found.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.