King v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was sufficient circumstantial evidencé to convict appellant of burglary even where appellant claimed that an unidentified person had forced him at gunpoint to break into the building and | ¿where no property was missing from the building

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ocheltree
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-03-30· cited 46×
• Grays v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1978-11-13· cited 19×
• Hill v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2015-11-04
• King v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1975-05-27

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Scates v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1968-03-11· cited 17×
• Clay v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1963-04-08· cited 11×