District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/23/2008
King v. State
Citations
- 988 So. 2d 111
- 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 11218
- 2008 WL 2927835
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “in a bench trial, there is a presumption that the trial court disregards any erroneously admitted evidence” and that the trial court “specifically stated that it was not considering testimony other than that directly related to the murder”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Polen, Taylor, Warner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. BaptistIllinois Supreme Court· 1979-05-18· cited 355×
- Straight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-03-19· cited 174×
- McLean v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-07-06· cited 125×
- First Atlantic National Bank v. CobbettSupreme Court of Florida· 1955-10-19· cited 38×
- People v. BrandonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-04-23· cited 27×
- State v. ArroyoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-26· cited 21×
- Daniels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-15· cited 18×
- People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-05-27· cited 12×
- C.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.