Skip to main content

King v. State

Citations

  • 988 So. 2d 111
  • 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 11218
  • 2008 WL 2927835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “in a bench trial, there is a presumption that the trial court disregards any erroneously admitted evidence” and that the trial court “specifically stated that it was not considering testimony other than that directly related to the murder”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Polen, Taylor, Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.