Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 7/24/2001
King v. State
Citations
- 29 P.3d 1089
- 2001 OK CR 22
- 72 O.B.A.J. 2153
- 2001 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 23
- 2001 WL 826929
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that an allegation of a “void or voidable sentence should not have been allowed to be the basis of a post-conviction proceeding, when the invalid sentence had already been expunged. . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lumpkin, Johnson, Chapel, Strubhar, Lile
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Logan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2013-01-11· cited 70×
- FLOWERS v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2016-10-20· cited 6×
- McCormack v. JonesTenth Circuit· 2007-09-06· cited 1×
- McCormack v. WardTenth Circuit· 2007-09-06
- Jose Rodriguez A.K.A. Alex Lopez v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2013-01-07
- Moore v. BooherTenth Circuit· 2001-12-20
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-05-23· cited 68×
- Bumpus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1996-10-22· cited 14×
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1989-07-07· cited 12×
- Stafford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1990-10-24· cited 11×
- Robertson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-01-20· cited 10×
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-03-09· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.