King v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because of presumption of innocence, it is proper to instruct the jury “that no inference of guilt is to be drawn from the fact that a grand jury has returned an indictment against the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Porter v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1979-07-03· cited 109×
• Timmons v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-12-12· cited 46×
• State Ex Rel. Pollard v. Criminal Ct. of Marion Cty.
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1975-06-11· cited 43×
• State v. Parks
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1968-02-21· cited 42×
• Dwyer v. McClean
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1961-05-19· cited 23×
• Loren Hamilton Fry v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2013-06-25· cited 22×
• Deaton v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1979-05-21· cited 10×
• State v. Mounts
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1984-03-30· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pearman v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1954-02-11· cited 41×
• O'Brien v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1890-09-16· cited 38×
• Rudd v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1952-08-04· cited 31×
• Long v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1874-05-15· cited 22×
• Green v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1910-06-15· cited 17×
• Pointer v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1883-05-15· cited 12×
• Hughes v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1876-11-15· cited 2×