King v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e may not and should not consider material that is not part of the record.”
• constitutional challenges are reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Edwin Jones v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-02-11· cited 29×
• United States v. Ty Brock
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-01-26· cited 7×
• Merrillville 2548, Inc. v. BMO Harris Bank N.A.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-06-09· cited 6×
• Hendricks v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-12-12· cited 5×
• In Re Crisis Connection, Inc.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2010-07-15· cited 3×
• State v. Fromme
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2010-07-15· cited 1×
• Unnamed case
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-06-09
• Victor Gersdorff v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-02-17
• Crystal Sells v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-07-30

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Litchfield v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2005-03-24· cited 465×
• Fair v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 121×
• Taylor v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-03· cited 98×
• State v. Gerschoffer
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-03-05· cited 87×
• State v. Garcia
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 45×
• State v. Boisvert
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-02-27· cited 19×
• Cheatham v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-12-09· cited 12×
• State ex rel. Willard Library v. Evansville-Vanderburgh Public Library
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-06-16· cited 2×