King v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the OSP had the authority to prosecute burglary charges that occurred in a single judicial circuit, where the burglary was part of a business enterprise (the operation of a chop shop) that was located in another judicial circuit
• \Nothing is more 'local' than a burglary unless the property burgled happens to sit on both sides of a county line.\
• \King had for some time . . . operated a motorcycle chop shop in Orange County (Ninth Circuit) which depended in part on stolen motorcycles from Volusia County (Seventh Circuit).\
• “[pjroof was submitted to the trial judge which convinced him of the truth of [the] allegation [establishing the OSP’s authority to prosecute]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Tacher
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-28· cited 9×
• Scott v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-02· cited 2×
• King v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-05-30· cited 1×
• King v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 2002-10-15
• Dominguez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-22
• State of Florida v. Peter Washington, Jr.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-02-21
• Hart v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-11-07
• State of Florida v. Anthony Hunter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-04-15

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Winter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-27· cited 18×