Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/24/1993
King v. State
Citations
- 848 S.W.2d 142
- 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 41
- 1993 WL 44421
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The court of appeals, while acknowledging the correct rule, failed to directly address the contention by discussing any of the evidence pointed to by the State”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-03-29· cited 564×
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-10· cited 7×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-01-29· cited 6×
- Cardwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-08-17· cited 2×
- Fuelberg, BennieCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-01-15
- Blocker, Gordon StanleyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-05-22
- Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-11-15
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.