King v. Sebelius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that courts have generally refused to permit defendants to weigh in on the adequacy or typicality of proposed lead plaintiffs but have permitted defendants to challenge the failure of a named plaintiff to file a certificate or the adequacy of plaintiff's notice
• “At this stage in the proceedings, the Court need only consider briefly the adequacy and typicality of the proposed lead plaintiffs, as all the requirements of Rule 23 will be examined in greater detail at the class certification hearing.”
• finding Business Wire to be “a sufficient form of notice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).