King v. Schriro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no prejudice where the petition did not contain information showing what the results of a more complete social and medical history would have been
• concluding that there was no prejudice where the petition did not contain information that would show what the results of a more complete social and medical history would have been
• holding no prejudice where defendant did not present evidence of what a more complete social and medical history investigation would have revealed
• holding no prejudice where defendant did not present evidence of what a more complete social and medical history investigation would have revealed
• “[D]espite the late hour, numerous indi- viduals saw parts of the events, and several described [King’s] sweater pattern.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).