Skip to main content
· 5/11/1992

King v. Russell

Citations

  • 963 F.2d 1301
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4005
  • 22 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1209
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 6295
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 10070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he only connection of Arizona to this suit is [the] plaintiff’s current maintenance of residence in Arizona. Thus, under the general venue statute, the District of Arizona is not the proper venue for this action.”
  • “Improper venue 7 is waived under Rule 12 only if a defendant moves to dismiss on one or more of 8 the other grounds specified by Rule 12 while failing to raise venue in the same 9 motion.”
  • “[I]t would not be in the interests of justice to transfer this case because, among other 27 reasons, King herself expressed no interest in transfer and . . . the action smacks of harassment and 28 bad faith . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.