King v. Putnam Investment Co.

Citations

• 248 U.S. 23
• 39 S. Ct. 15
• 63 L. Ed. 102
• 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1715

Syllabus

<p>The contention that a contract of agency to sell real estate was void because federal lands, under homestead entry, were included, presents no federal question where the state court found they were not included and the record supports the finding.</p>