Skip to main content
· 6/18/1906

King v. N. O. Terminal Co.

Citations

  • 3 Teiss. 490
  • 1906 La. App. LEXIS 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in interpreting related and co-existing statutes, we must harmonize and accord full application to each of these statutes unless they are irreconcilable and in hopeless conflict.
  • convicted felon’s right to hold public office can be restored only through pardon or ex-pungement processes and is not automatically restored by “termination of sentence or probation or by final release on parole”
  • remedial expungement provisions must be “liberally construed to promote their purpose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dufour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.