Skip to main content
· 11/14/1978

King v. Masson

Citations

  • 251 S.E.2d 107
  • 148 Ga. App. 229
  • 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 3138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming jury verdict in favor of plaintiff based upon defendant’s slanderous statement that plaintiff was “a dope addict” and “on drugs”
  • affirming jury verdict in favor of plaintiff based upon defendant's slanderous statement that plaintiff was \a dope addict\ and \on drugs\
  • privileged communications status of bona fide statements in performance of public duty (OCGA § 51-5-7 (1)) may be lost when official acts are done wilfully, corruptly, or maliciously

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shulman, Bell, Birdsong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.