Supreme Court of Louisiana· 5/1/1989
King v. Louviere
Citations
- 543 So. 2d 1327
- 1989 WL 43740
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing dual garde and noting that under appropriate circumstances the custody or garde of a thing may be divided between two persons
- declining to address whether an employee, in addition to the employer, can have custody of his employer’s motor vehicle
- secretary driving defective car did not have garde; owner did
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dennis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1990-03-12· cited 1,021×
- Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2009-05-22· cited 399×
- Ferrell v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1995-02-20· cited 387×
- Spott v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1992-06-22· cited 237×
- Tyler Renwick v. P N K Lake Charles, L.L.C.Fifth Circuit· 2018-08-27· cited 207×
- Dupree v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2000-08-31· cited 163×
- Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RRSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-04-03· cited 141×
- Doughty v. Insured Lloyds Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1991-03-11· cited 77×
- Reichert v. State, Dept. of Transp. and DevelopmentSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1997-05-20· cited 48×
- Thumfart v. LombardLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1993-01-21· cited 32×
- Quinn v. RISO Investments, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2004-03-03· cited 31×
- Smith v. Two\ R\ Drilling Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1992-08-20· cited 26×
- Chavers v. Bright Truck LeasingLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2006-12-06· cited 25×
- Stapleton v. Great Lakes Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1993-12-07· cited 25×
- Smith v. State Through Dept. of Public SafetyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1992-09-28· cited 24×
- Ehrman v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1995-03-29· cited 22×
- Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2006-01-19· cited 22×
- Williams v. US Agencies Cas. Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-02-21· cited 20×
- Brumfield v. GaffordLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2000-09-22· cited 20×
- Myers v. Burger King Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1994-05-26· cited 18×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1973-09-24· cited 2,946×
- Loescher v. ParrSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1975-12-22· cited 590×
- Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1972-01-17· cited 459×
- Entrevia v. HoodSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1983-02-23· cited 351×
- Langlois v. Allied Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1971-06-07· cited 282×
- Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1988-09-12· cited 180×
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. Bean DredgingSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1984-02-27· cited 94×
- Simon v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1973-08-27· cited 84×
- Ross v. La Coste De MontervilleSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1987-02-23· cited 74×
- Rizley v. CutrerSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1957-04-01· cited 73×
- Noland v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1957-04-01· cited 63×
- Cartwright v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, NJSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1969-06-09· cited 29×
- Brannon v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1987-05-18· cited 21×
- King v. LouviereLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-04-06· cited 10×
- Metzger v. ScottLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1971-02-08· cited 5×
- Keck v. YocumLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1971-07-13· cited 4×
- Davis v. LogarboLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1977-05-17· cited 3×
Other cases named King v. Louviere
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.