King v. Kentucky Board of Pharmacy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a substantial contingent liability constitutes an injury in fact
• noting that a plaintiff “conceivably may one day request medical records from [the] defendants” is not sufficient to demonstrate a likelihood of future harm
• noting that “a legal duty to pay” is an injury, and collecting cases
• finding adequate allegations of materially misleading conduct where complaint stated simply that the fees charged to the plaintiffs exceeded the defendant’s cost to produce the medical records, and the cost to produce the medical records was substantially less than $0.75 per page
• “[A] healthcare provider may not charge more than the actual ‘costs incurred’ for copies — but that - charge is capped at $0.75 per page.”
• “Because it is jurisdictional, the Court first considers defendants’ argument that plaintiffs lack standing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).