King v. Jefferson City School Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an easement was not totally extinguished because passage on foot was still possible
• holding that an easement was not totally extinguished because passage on foot was still possible
• observing that, in the context of a claim of adverse possession necessary to extinguish an easement, “[the] erection of fences or gates . . . is often compatible with the continued use of an easement, and thus is not adverse”
• explaining when easements acquired by grant may be extinguished through adverse possession
• use of land by servient tenant must be \incompatible or irreconcilable with\ easement rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).