King v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming grant of summary judgment where no issue of material fact remains as to allegedly ambiguous contract term
• “When the language of an agreement is plain and unambiguous, the court must afford its literal meaning, despite a party’s contention that he understood the contract to mean something else.” (punctuation omitted and emphasis supplied)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).