District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/5/1982
King v. Harrington
Citations
- 411 So. 2d 912
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Under Florida law, a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence will not be granted unless the evidence ... is material, and is not merely cumulative or impeaching.”
- \It is the movant's burden to establish the exercise of due diligence. It is not sufficient to merely show that the evidence was not discovered or known to counsel until after trial.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boardman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.