Skip to main content
· 11/7/2003

King v. Graham

Citations

  • 126 S.W.3d 75
  • 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 85
  • 2003 Tex. LEXIS 528
  • 2003 WL 22594231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that an inference could be drawn if the only evidence the official had in deciding to prosecute was false
  • noting that there was no evidence that the district attorney would have decided not to prosecute but for the allegedly false information
  • providing that an adverse inference could be drawn if the only evidence -the official had in deciding to prosecute was false
  • holding insufficient evidence of causation where “[n]othing in the record shows that the false information was material to the decision to prosecute”
  • considering plaintiffs failure to offer any evidence, such as the district attorney’s opinion that the decision to prosecute was based on any false informa tion supplied by defendant
  • “In other words, there must be proof that the prosecutor acted based on the false information and that but for such false information the decision would not have been made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jefferson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.