King v. Frank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a prisoner did not demonstrate “an atypical and significant hardship” where the prisoner was forced to wear a paper gown for forty days
• “Although plaintiff alleges that he was ‘depressed’ by the noise, I cannot infer reasonably from plaintiff's complaint that the noise caused him an injury significant enough to give rise to an Eighth Amendment violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).