Skip to main content
· 8/9/2006

King v. Cunningham

Citations

  • 442 F. Supp. 2d 171
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55744
  • 2006 WL 2322723

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding petitioner’s “Eighth Amendment ‘excessive sentence’ claim unexhausted because the constitutional nature of the claim was not ‘fairly presented’ to the state courts on direct appeal”
  • “The standard for competency to plead guilty is no higher than the standard for competency to stand trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.