Skip to main content
· 11/4/1988

King v. Barron

Citations

  • 770 P.2d 975
  • 95 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1988 Utah LEXIS 111
  • 1988 WL 118978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding severance appropriate where merging trial for plaintiffs legally unrelated claims “would invite error and confusion” by forcing jury to consider different evidence and theories in relation to separate defendants
  • finding severance appropriate where merging trial for plaintiff's legally unrelated claims \would invite error and confusion\ by forcing jury to consider different evidence and theories in relation to separate defendants
  • stating, with regard to Worthington, “[w]e do not disagree with that analysis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howe, Hall, Stewart, Durham, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.