King v. Aetna Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding similar interaction undermined insured’s argument that it could not “have appreciated that [such information] would be equally material” to the current insurer
• insured’s representation of value of vessel purchased for $2,500 as $40,000 was material as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).