King Sang Chow v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding jurisdictional bar itself, in INA § 106(a)(10) enacted by AEDPA § 440(a), did not 90 constitutional attack on a jurisdiction-stripping statute in this court of appeals was not foreclosed by INA § 106(a)(10
• deciding jurisdictional bar itself, in INA § 106(a)(10) enacted by AEDPA § 440(a), did not 89 constitutional attack on a jurisdiction-stripping statute in this court of appeals was not foreclosed by INA § 106(a)(10
• “Any ‘final order of deportation’ as used in 440(a) includes orders to reconsider or to reopen any such final order of deportation and removes from our jurisdiction Mr. Chow’s appeal.”
• “Congress has not clearly expressed an intent to depart from the long line of Supreme Court and appellate court decisions interpreting ‘order of deportation’ to include orders denying motions to reconsider and reopen.”
• “Congress has not clearly expressed an intent to depart from the long line of Supreme Court and appellate court decisions interpreting ‘order of deportation’ to include orders denying motions to reconsider and reopen.”
• an order of deporta- tion includes “orders denying motions to reconsider and reopen”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).