· 8/7/2007
King Ex Rel. King v. East St. Louis School District 189
Citations
- 496 F.3d 812
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18659
- 2007 WL 2241649
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming district court’s summary judgment ruling based solely on one prong of the state-created danger excep- tion
- applying DeShaney to bar a claim that a school failed to protect a student from a private attack while walking home
- affirming district court’s summary judgment ruling based solely on one prong of the state-created danger excep- tion
- affirming district court’s summary judgment ruling based solely on one prong of the state-created danger excep- tion
- affirming district court’s summary judgment ruling based solely on one prong of the state-created danger excep- tion
- applying a \state-created danger\ doctrine, but requiring as an element that the affirmative action \shock the conscience\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Ripple, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.