E.D. Michigan· 7/24/2002
King Enterprises, Inc. v. Thomas Township
Citations
- 215 F. Supp. 2d 891
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13425
- 2002 WL 1677687
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- sign ordinance provisions that contained “reasonably clear and concise requirements for the physical aspects of signs” were not unconstitutionally vague
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jocham v. Tuscola CountyE.D. Michigan· 2003-01-07· cited 25×
- Karhani v. MeijerE.D. Michigan· 2003-06-06· cited 6×
- Goedert v. City of FerndaleE.D. Michigan· 2008-04-04· cited 5×
- Covenant Media of Illinois, L.L.C. v. City of Des Plaines, IllinoisN.D. Illinois· 2005-06-08· cited 3×
- Little MacK Entertainment II, Inc. v. Township of MarengoW.D. Michigan· 2008-07-17· cited 1×
- Fehribach v. City of TroyE.D. Michigan· 2006-01-30
- Marras v. City of LivoniaE.D. Michigan· 2008-08-15
Cites
61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 3,694×
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 3,406×
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanySixth Circuit· 1990-05-25· cited 2,773×
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,526×
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 2,461×
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 2,188×
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court· 1990-01-10· cited 2,054×
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 2,052×
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 1,847×
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court· 1994-08-24· cited 1,695×
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 1,485×
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 2000-06-28· cited 1,399×
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court· 1938-03-28· cited 1,301×
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court· 1969-03-10· cited 1,269×
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 1,256×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.