King Electric, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 8, Intervenor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “According to the Board, without the ‘51% rule,’ King employees would not have been eligible for … refer- rals … .”
• “According to the Board, without the ‘51% rule,’ King employees would not have been eligible for … refer- rals … .”
• “As we have indicated, a union’s grant to employees of a benefit to which they are not otherwise entitled, during an election campaign, is still objectionable … .”
• “As we have indicated, a union’s grant to employees of a benefit to which they are not otherwise entitled, during an election campaign, is still objectionable … .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).