· 3/1/1962
King County v. Theilman
Citations
- 369 P.2d 503
- 59 Wash. 2d 586
- 1962 Wash. LEXIS 437
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ ‘Public use’ and ‘necessity’ cannot be separated with scalpellic precision, for the first is sufficiently broad to include an element of the latter.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weaver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.