Skip to main content
· 3/1/1962

King County v. Theilman

Citations

  • 369 P.2d 503
  • 59 Wash. 2d 586
  • 1962 Wash. LEXIS 437

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “ ‘Public use’ and ‘necessity’ cannot be separated with scalpellic precision, for the first is sufficiently broad to include an element of the latter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weaver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.