King County v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTH

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that challenges to polices designed to implement comprehensive plans must be brought to GMHB
• recognizing that challenges to policies designed to implement comprehensive plans must be brought to the GMHB
• noting that “counties are required to ‘provid [e] for early and continuous public participation’ ” (alteration in original) (quoting RCW 36.70A.140)
• noting that \counties are required to `provid[e] for early and continuous public participation'\ (alteration in original) (quoting RCW 36.70A.140)
• “[w]here there is no [state] case law construing provisions of the [state administrative procedure act], federal precedent may serve as persuasive authority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).