King Coal Co. v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The decision of the trial judge not to recuse will not be disturbed on review except for an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Holt v. Department of Public Welfare
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-06-20· cited 13×
• Domestic Relations Section for Diehl v. Mulhern
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-24· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Horne
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-14· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Kane
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-09-13· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. West
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-05· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Scheetz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-06-12· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Alvarez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-06-11· cited 5×