Kindred v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction for theft where the defendant was the only person in the filling station at the time the money was taken
• holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction for theft where the defendant was the only person in the filling station at the time the money was taken
• “[T]he fact that appellant was in the room alone at a time the evidence shows the cash register was opened and the fact that immediately thereafter the money was missing is sufficient upon which the trier of fact could find appellant had taken the money”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kindred v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1988-06-08· cited 67×
• Kindred v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-06-28· cited 53×
• Bennett v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-08-02· cited 14×
• Throop v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1970-07-08· cited 10×
• Kindred v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-12-12· cited 6×
• Kindred v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1970-05-08· cited 3×
• Bullitt v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1974-08-29· cited 2×
• Tyler Steffey v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-09-27

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Easton v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1967-07-20· cited 113×
• Hilligoss v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1970-02-05· cited 24×