Kindquist v. Samero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• abuse of discretion only where no conscientious judge, acting intelligently, honestly could have taken view of motion judge
• abuse of discretion defined as view or action “that no conscientious judge, acting intelligently, could honestly have taken”
• abuse of discretion by judge means “no conscientious judge, acting intelligently, could honestly have taken the view expressed by him”
• abuse of discretion defined as view or action “that no conscientious judge, acting intelligently, could honestly have taken”
• “abuse of discretion” is view or action “no conscientious judge, acting intelligently, could honestly have taken”
• abuse of discretion defined as view or action “that no conscientious judge, acting intelligently, could honestly have taken”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).