Skip to main content
· 6/5/2015

Kindig v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 608 F. App'x 14

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that retaliation claims under Title VII and § 1981 are “functionally identical”
  • ‘[B]ecause the proposed salary decrease never came to fruition, it cannot constitute an adverse employment action’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffith, Pillard, Srinivasan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.