Skip to main content
· 6/15/1876

Kinder v. Brink, McCormick Co.

Citations

  • 82 Ill. 376

Syllabus

<p>1. Proposition—•binding on party malcing, when acted on by other party. A proposition in writing, signed by a party, to pay a sum of money to another upon the performance by the other of certain things, when accepted and acted upon, and the things to be done are performed before the proposition is withdrawn, becomes binding on the party signing it.</p> <p>3. Instruction—whether calculated to mislead. An instruction stated to the jury, that if certain work was of the character contemplated by the parties, the jury should find, etc. It was objected that the word “quality” should have been used instead of “ character,” but the court held that the words were frequently used convertibly, and that in the connection in which the term was used in the instruction, it could not have misled the jury.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • positing that the general rule is that one asking for a privilege or seeking to enforce a right conferred by statute must show itself to be within the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.