Kinder Morgan Michigan, LLC v. City of Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to address a jurisdictional issue raised for the first time in a reply brief
• declining to address issues first raised in a reply brief because “[r]eply briefs must be confined to rebuttal, and a party may not raise new or additional arguments in its reply brief”
• declining to address issues first raised in a reply brief because “[r]eply briefs must be confined to rebuttal, and a party may not raise new or additional arguments in its reply brief”
• “[W]hen a statute is ambiguous on its face and reasonable minds can differ with respect to its meaning, judicial construction is necessary to determine the intent of the Legislature.”
• “Reply briefs must be confined to rebuttal, and a party may not raise new or additional arguments in its reply brief.”
• “Reply briefs must be confined to rebuttal, and a party may not raise new or additional arguments in its reply brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).