· 6/10/2011
Kindel v. Tennis
Citations
- 949 N.E.2d 1119
- 409 Ill. App. 3d 1138
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where there were questions of fact as to whether caring for bull was part of plaintiff farmhand’s job, summary judgment on Animal Control Act claim was improper
- where there were questions of fact as to whether caring for bull was part of plaintiff farmhand's job, summary judgment on Animal Control Act claim was improper
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spomer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.