Skip to main content
· 12/13/1917

Kind v. Bodek

Citations

  • 68 Pa. Super. 517
  • 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 160

Syllabus

<p>Husband and wife — Goods furnished on credit of wife — Diamond pin — Necessaries.</p> <p>In an action against a wife to recover the cost of a diamond bar pin, a judgment for plaintiff will be sustained, where the testimony of a clerk of plaintiff, although contradicted by defendant, was to the effect that defendant had purchased the ring herself and told him “to charge the pin to her” and that she said “to charge and send it to her.”</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Kephart, Oelady, Poe, Tee, Trexler, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.