Kincek v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the state’s argument that the post-conviction court misunderstood and misapplied the law, where the state had “ ‘cherry-picked out of context’ a single remark from the post-conviction court’s oral description of its thought process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).