Skip to main content
· 3/24/1976

Kincaid v. State of Texas

Citations

  • 534 S.W.2d 340
  • 1976 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 912

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court’s failure to sustain objection to prosecutor’s misstatement of parole law to appellant’s detriment was harmful error and noting that jury assessed maximum penalty allowed
  • generally, a party who introduces a version of events to the jury, invites the other side to respond to that evidence
  • as a general rule, when a party introduces matters into evidence, he invites the other side to reply to that evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.