Kincaid v. Morgan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a boundary by estoppel claim requires \permanent improvements\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that a boundary by estoppel claim requires \permanent improvements\ (internal quotation marks omitted); Pickett v. Nelson, 71 Wis. 542, 37 N.W. 836, 838 (1888) (requiring \permanent improvements\ in order to sustain a boundary by estop-pel claim
• noting, in a case involving a permanent trespass on nonresidential property, that “actual damages should be calculated by taking the value of the property before the trespass and subtracting the value of the property after the trespass”
• noting, in a case involving a permanent trespass on nonresidential property, that “actual damages should be calculated by taking the value of the property before the trespass and subtracting the value of the property after the trespass”
• this Court will remand case for further development if record has not been adequately developed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).