Skip to main content
· 9/14/1982

Kinark Corp. v. Camelot, Inc.

Citations

  • 548 F. Supp. 429
  • 216 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 111
  • 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Ejxtensive third-party use of the [mark was] impressive evidence that there would be no likelihood of confusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brotman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.